Saturday, January 14, 2012

The point of Fine Arts in the Classroom

Fine Arts is defined in the Encarta Dictionary as being, “any art form, for example, painting, sculpture, architecture, drawing, or engraving, that is determined to have purely aesthetic value” (Encarta, 2004). Though this definition is used in association with the arts in the regular world, in regards to teaching, fine arts is defined as a branch beneficial, not essential, to the learning process and is often phased out because of lack of time, slight learning potential, and no money. Fine arts is simply seen as painting and drawing, not a branch studied by an schoraly scholar. Writer Victoria Jacobs explains, “Arts in elementary schools have often been separated from the core curriculum and instead, offered as enrichment activities that are determined useful but not essential” (Jacobs, 1999, p. 2).

What is missing in classrooms is the lack of teacher knowledge of the benefits of maintaining an art- based curriculum. Teachers “have very slight comprehension of the arts as disciplines of study. They think of the arts education as teacher-oriented projects used to entertain or teach other disciplines” (Berghoff, 2003, p. 12). Fine arts expand the boundaries of learning for the students and encourage creative thinking and a deeper comprehension of the core subjects, which are language arts, math, science, and social studies. Teachers need to concentrate all genres of fine arts, which include, theater, visual art, dance, and music, into their lesson plans because the arts gives the students motivational tools to unlock a deeper comprehension of their education. Teaching the arts is the most remarkable tool that teachers can gift in their classrooms because this enables the students to achieve their highest level of learning.

From 1977 to 1988 there were only three paramount reports demonstrating the benefits of art education. These three reports are advent to Our Senses, by the Arts, education and Americans Panal (1977), Can we rescue the Arts for American Children, sponsored by the American Council for the Arts (1988), and the most respected study, Toward Civilization, by the National Endowment for the Arts (1988). These three studies conjured that art education was very important in achieving a higher education for our students. While these studies proved the arts to be useful to the learning process, it was not until 2002 when the explore pathology of considerable Links: learning in the Arts and pupil schoraly and social amelioration “provided evidence for improving learning and achievement as well as positive social outcomes when the arts were integral to students’ learning experiences” was taken seriously by lawmakers (Burns, 2003, p. 5). One study, in this analysis, was focused on the teaching of keyboard training to a classroom in order to see if student’s scores on spatial thinking could be improved. It was then compared to those students who received computer training which complicated no fine art components. This done that learning straight through the arts did improve the scores on other core curriculum subjects such as math and science where spatial thinking is most used (Swan-Hudkins, 2003).

This study shows how one slight convert in the way students are taught straight through the arts can have a remarkable impact on their learning achievements and understandings. Other study showed at-risk students who, for one year, participated in an art- based curriculum raised their standardized language arts test by an mean of eight percentile points, 16 percentile points if enrolled for two years. Students not interesting in this form of performance did not show a convert of percentile (Swan-Hudkins, 2003). Though this may not seem like a big increase, at- risk students were able to use this style of learning to great understand their learning style thus bettering their learning patterns. The most interesting case study in this pathology complicated the schools of Sampson, North Carolina, where for two years in a row their standardized test scores rose only in the schools that implemented the arts education in their school district (Swan-Hudkins, 2003). Teaching the arts needs to be incorporated in every teachers daily lesson plans because, based on these studies, students who are taught straight through the arts raise their test and learning levels.

Due to the high volume of concentration President Bush’s, No Child Left Behind Act, has required in schools, teaching the arts is left behind. Other surmise for the lack of arts in the classroom author Victoria Jacobs explains, “Given the shrinking budgets of school districts around the country, art specialists and art programs have disappeared from many elementary schools” (Jacobs, 1999, p. 4). Fine arts are being seen as non-educational or an extra-curricular activity. Therefore, when there is a lack of money in school districts, this branch is beyond doubt being cut. Teachers need to find a way to concentrate the arts into the classroom rather than rely on face activities and Jacobs suggests teaching “through the arts… with a means of using the arts successfully and in a way that it is not just “one more thing” they must comprise in the curriculum” (Jacobs, 1999, p. 4).

The arts can open the minds of students in ways mere reading and writing will never be able to accomplish. Yet, the point of teaching this branch is not to teach about the arts, but to teach straight through the arts. Jacobs explains,
Teaching though the arts requires students to engage in the act of creative art. For example they might draw a picture, write a poem, act in a drama, or make music to added their comprehension of concepts in content areas other than the arts. Teaching straight through the arts helps students perceive concepts rather than simply discussing or reading them. This approach is consistent with educational theories that highlight the significance of reaching manifold learning styles or intelligences. (Jacobs, 1999, p. 2)

Teaching straight through the arts can be done in many different ways depending on the teacher’s interests, but truly is the only way to reinforce the students learning experience. In a time where allocation cuts and new learning laws are being established, teachers need to be more informed and educated on the negative impacts of the loss of the fine arts programs.
Three, veteran teachers at a social elementary school did a case study which complicated teaching straight through the arts. They believed “our students had to perceive cycles of inquiry wherein they learned about the arts and straight through the arts, and that they needed to see teachers of different disciplines collaborate” (Berghoff, 2003, p. 2).

The study was based on teaching a history lesson unit on relaxation and Slavery straight through the arts. Ms. Bixler-Borgmann had her students listen to the song “Swing Low, Sweet Chariot” in many different styles of music, such as an African-American Quartet, Reggae, and Show Tunes. She then incorporated this lesson into the significance singing played to the slaves at that time. Ms. Berghoff had her students read samples of African-American folk literature and write down sentences that made an impact on them while they were reading. She then incorporated those sentences into group poems. Ms. Parr explored two art pieces entitled, “Swing Low, Sweet Chariot” and had the students talk about artwork by asking three questions: "What is going on in this picture? What do you see that makes you say that? What else can you find?” (Berghoff, 2003). She also had the students focus on the images, concepts, and meanings which the artists wanted to depict. Ms. Parr felt this would teach the students how to uncover the inexpressive meanings in other core curriculum subjects (Berghoff, 2003). After the study, the students were asked what and how they had learned from this style of teaching.

Many students wrote in their journals that working in manifold sign systems in parallel ways heightened their emotional involvement. They found themselves thinking about what they were learning in class when they were at home or at work. They noted that even though they had studied slavery at other times, they had never beyond doubt imagined how it felt to be a slave or understanding about the slaves' perspectives and struggles. (Berghoff, 2003)

The students had learned more from this lesson because they were able to use all styles of learning and were taught from an angle which is rarely used, straight through the arts. “Studies indicate that a victorious arts integrated agenda will use these components to guide pupil learning and correlate increase and amelioration (Swan-Hudkins, 2003). The students were able to learn based on abstract thinking and find the deeper meaning of the lessons ready by the teachers.

“The study of the arts has the potential for providing other benefits traditionally related with arts….arts has been related to students’ increased considerable and creative thinking skills, self-esteem, willingness to take risks, and ability to work with others” (Jacobs, 1999, p. 4). With these benefits, teachers can not afford to limit their teaching of the arts in the classroom. Teaching straight through the arts are the key elements of learning and the traits teachers strive to make and reinforce in their students. By working straight through the arts, instead of about the arts, the students’ educational perceive will be achieved in a different way than just teaching the proper style of learning. Previous Governor of California, Gray Davis, noted, “Art education helps students make creativity, self-expression, analytical skills, discipline, cross-cultural understandings, and a heightened appreciation for the arts” and that “students who make artistic expression and creative question solving skills are more like to result in school and will be great ready for the jobs and careers of the future” (California Art Study, 2003, p. 1).

Exposing students to abstract learning will teach the students about logic and thinking and help them grasp what might not be represented on the surface. new Reports from the National Art education association (Naea) confirmed with Governor Davis when they reported “Students in art study score higher on both their Verbal and Math Sat tests than those who are not enrolled in arts courses (California Art Study, 2003, p. 5). Attached is a copy of the test scores of students in the arts and students with no arts coursework.

What is a great way to improve a lesson plan than to add Other size of learning than by incorporating different levels of teaching? A firm that has the basis of focusing on different learning styles is Links for Learning, [http://www.links-for-learning.com]. This firm understands the significance of incorporating arts into the classroom. Previous Secretary of Education, William Bennet wrote, “The arts are considerable elements of education just like reading, writing, and arithmetic…Music, dance, painting, and theater are keys to unlock profound human comprehension and accomplishment” (Swann-Hudkins, 2002).

An example of the benefits of teaching the arts would be the study of a teacher who taught the water cycle lesson straight through movement and music. The students were introduced to the water cycle in the customary style of teaching, reading and lecturing. Yet, in order for the students to fully understand the “experience” of being a snowflake, the students listened to Tchaikovsky’s Nutcracker Suite (The Waltz of the Snowflakes) and done their eyes visualizing the adventure snowflakes encounter on there way to the ground. A great side result of dance is that “exposure to dances foreign to them (the students) helps them to understand and appreciate differences in societies. Their minds come to be open to new ideas and a different perspective. This comprehension helps to eliminate potential prejudice, enriching the pupil and our society” (Swan-Hudkins, 2003, p.17). While the music was playing the teacher asked them questions, such as, “How are they going to land” and “What do you see as you are falling”. The second time listening to the music the students were asked to act out the water cycle straight through movement and dance. Teachers should know “a class that includes dance can make students feel empowered and actively complicated in their education. In creating their own dance, students make conceptional thinking, which is not always expressed verbally” (Swan-Hudkins, 2003, p. 17).

With these activities, the students were able to come to be part of the water cycle instead of just using their listening skills and trying to mentally figure out this lesson. The teacher also had the students write a poem using words they felt while they, the snowflakes, were falling to the ground (Jacobs, 1999, p.2). “The motivational powers of the arts are considerable as this teacher explained, “Hooking a kid is half, if not more than half, the battle of learning. If you can hook them, then you can get them to learn” (Jacobs, 1999, p. 6). Teachers need to gain entrance to all styles of learning which can only spark their motivational powers.
Harvard task Researchers Winner and Hetland remarks, “The best hope for the arts in our school is to by comparison them by what they can do that other subjects can’t do as well” (Swan-Hudkins, 2003, p. 18). Teachers need to gain a great education of teaching their students straight through the arts. Without the arts, teachers are limiting their students’ ability to use their whole thinking process, providing less opening for complete comprehension. Teaching straight through the arts is the most remarkable tool that teachers can give in their classrooms because it enables the students to achieve their highest level of learning.

With the lack of concentration art is getting face of the classroom, teachers cannot afford not to concentrate dance, theater, visual arts, or music in their lesson plans. Fine arts is the core curriculums constant and most important companion. No child should be left behind, and teaching straight through the arts will reinforce this idea.

Resources

Berghoff, B., Bixler-Borgmann, C., and Parr, C. (2003). Cycles of Inquiry with the Arts. Urbana, 17, 1-17.

Burns, M. (2003). Connecting Arts education course and explore to Classroom Teaching. Presented at The each year Meeting of the American Educational explore Association. Chicago, Il.

California Art Study. (2003). Retrieved on April 18 from [http://216.239.57.104/search?q=cache:Im_j8A3_whsJ:www.smc.edu/madison/about/draft_eir/appendix_f_purpose.pdf+benefits+California+art+study&hl=en&ie=Utf-8]

Encarta Online Dictionary. (2004). Retrieved on April 17 from http://encarta.msn.com/dictionary_/fine%20arts.html

Jacobs, V. And Goldberg, M. (1999). Teaching Core Curriculum content straight through the Arts. each year Meeting of the American Educational explore Association. Ontario, Canada.

Swan-Hudkins, B. (2002). The result of an Elementary Fine Arts agenda on Students’. M.A.Thesis. Salem International University. Salem, West Virginia.

No comments:

Post a Comment